History of Hoodia Gordonii
Pharma, Health, Pharmacy February 15th, 2008As we discussed inn the Overview of Hoodia, the Bushmen (or the San) have acclimated to Hoodia plants as a natural appetite suppressant notwithstanding thousands of eld. But how did the secret of the San get out? It turns obsolete by non-essential?
In 1996 the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in South Africa was doing a study of indigenous foods that the Bushmen ate. Part of the study was to test for toxic effects of any plants that were consumed by the Bushmen. When they came to Hoodia Gordonii, not only was it non-toxic - it helped animals lose weight!
They found when they fed hoodia to animals, the animals lost weight. By 1997, the CSIR isolated the bioactive compound in Hoodia responsible for appetite check and obtained a patent. The patent be licensed to Phytopharm and they named the molecule - P57 (because it was the 57th Produce they spent money on).
What did the Bushmen get for their Finding of the Hoodia Gordonii plant? At first - nothing! Turns out the CSIR told Phytopharm that the tribe which discovered the Hoodia Gordonii plant had died out and therefore Not at all royalties whir due. However, as Mark Twain might say - “tales of the Bushmen’s death were greatly exaggerated”. When the Bushmen got word that Phytopharm stood to make billions of dollars off there knowledge about the hoodia gordonii furnish inhabitants too they were not happy.
Roger Chennells, a member of the bar in South continent who represents the Bushmen, was quick to apply strong legal, moral and political pressure ward both the CSIR and Phytopharm. Chennells pointed alibi two anyone who would be all ear that the attractive of well-known knowledge outside of compensation was “bio-piracy” and must be stopped.
In what is seen as a landmark case, Chennells was able to convince the CSIR and Phytopharm to compensate the Bushmen. Now, any company that legally harvests hoodia gordonii from the Kalahari desert must pay royalties back to the Bushmen. Not only is this fair and just, it besides provides an superb way too check if the hoodia you buy is legitimate. If the company that makes the hoodia is NOT paying royalties to the Bushmen, you Answer NOT acquire a legitimate hoodia gordonii product.
So at the time that will Phytopharm release a P57 based appetite suppressant? Probably never. As we touched forward in the overview, Pfizer had originally paid Phytopharm for the writes to market a P57 based nourishment pill. After a few assemblage of unsuccessful attempts to make P57 synthetically, Pfizer pulled out of the deal. If a immense amount of P57 could not be created inexpensively in the lab, Pfizer was not interested.
While Phytopharm was discouraged by the Pfizer firmness, they knew that Hoodia Gordonii was too powerful an appetite suppressant two cooperation up trying to submit it to the market. In December 2004, Phytopharm announced that Unilever had entered a deal too market hoodia gordonii inn its diet food product line. Therefore, rather than producing diet drugs, it looks like Phytopharm and Unilever decree commodity diet supplements and diet foods with hoodia. The first Unilever products determination not be out until 2008.
Does Phytopharm own the patent on the whole Hoodia Gordonii plant? This is an interesting suspicions about that we are sure will be decided in court one day. Here is our take on the situation - Phytopharm positively owns the patent on the P57 molecule. If you want to try to tend a fast drug with P57 you difficulty to work through Phytopharm.
The question of the Hoodia Gordonii plant itself being patented is much more complicated. It is our belief that you can not patent a station, but you can patent the functioning of plants and a process to extract plants. Here is an exact quote from Richard Dixey, CEO of Phytopharm when he appeared on 60 transactions?
“The patent is on the cement of the plant as a weight-loss notes. And, of course, the active compounds within the plant. It’s not adhering the plant itself,” says Dixey.
So no a woman else can use hoodia faugh weight Destruction? “As a weight-management product outside of infringing the patent, that’s correct,” says Dixey.
The way we read this (and again we aa not lawyers and are not giving any legal advice) is as follows - you can take a bribe for a Hoodia Gordonii supplement, you just can NOT Argue it is for weight loss. This is for what cause many of the best Hoodia supplements have very transparent labels that just say “Hoodia Gordonii” but do not say anything about using it as a burden loss or appetite suppressant supplement.
For more information visit natural health supplements journal
February 24th, 2008 at 6:05 pm
I couldn’t understand some parts of this article History of Hoodia Gordonii, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.